"We are fully cognizant of the importance of this launch to Intelsat and all stakeholders and are particularly proud to have been chosen as the launch services partner," said David Markham, president of Lockheed Martin Commercial Launch Services. "This mission will further demonstrate the reliability, flexibility and capabilities of the Atlas launch vehicle, which can be applied to the commercial market as we continue to seek one to two commercial orders per year."

Intelsat is the leading provider of fixed satellite services worldwide. For 45 years, Intelsat has been delivering information and entertainment for many of the world’s leading media and network companies, multinational corporations, Internet service providers and governmental agencies. Intelsat’s satellite, teleport and fiber infrastructure is unmatched in the industry, setting the standard for transmissions of video, data and voice services.

Lockheed Martin Commercial Launch Services, which markets the Atlas V to commercial customers worldwide, is a unit of Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, which is a major operating unit of Lockheed Martin Corporation. Space Systems Company designs, develops, tests, manufactures and operates a full spectrum of advanced-technology systems for national security, civil and commercial customers. Chief products include human space flight systems; a full range of remote sensing, navigation, meteorological and communications satellites and instruments; space observatories and interplanetary spacecraft; laser radar; ballistic missiles; missile defense systems; and nanotechnology research and development.

Headquartered in Bethesda, Md., Lockheed Martin is a global security company that employs about 140,000 people worldwide and is principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of advanced technology systems, products and services. The corporation reported 2008 sales of $42.7 billion.
source: money.cnn.com

This new microwave-based WIREFREE internet service offers additional coverage in areas that WIREFREE USA - Mountain Communications had previously covered with only WildBlue and HughesNet.

This expanded area will help customers in rural areas that have no other option for high-speed internet. These new areas of coverage will include Lead, Deadwood, Spearfish, Newell, Sturgis, Belle Fourche and eastern Wyoming communities that are within their microwave boundaries, such as Sundance, Beulah and Aladdin.

This newer wireless WIREFREE microwave internet service offers full unlimited high-speed internet capabilities. Microwave internet offers superior capabilities to penetrate trees and obstructions better than traditional point to point wireless connections. It also has a better signal in inclement weather allowing for less down time for users and businesses.

Contact WIREFREE USA - Mountain Communications for more information concerning all your wireless WIREFREE internet service, satellite TV, and home and business electronics needs. WIREFREE USA offers: Dish Network, DirecTV, WildBlue, HughesNet, security systems, TVs, and other home and business electronic products.

source: blackhillsportal.com

He's just released an annual report that shows contract disputes are rising.

"We see plenty of complaints in which customers tell us that their provider insists that the relationship is governed by a contract, which is contrary to the customer's understanding," he says.

As Commissioner for Complaints for Telecommunications Services, he and his staff dealt with 3,214 complaints last year. While billing issues were the major irritant, contract disputes came second – figuring into 27.4 per cent of the complaints. Agreements for telecom services are often entered into online or by phone, Maker says. There can be a lack of clarity in the nature of the agreement.

Can't he work with the companies to better protect customers bound by unwritten contracts?

Unfortunately, he doesn't feel he has the power to do so.

"I agree with you that formally documenting any contractual agreement makes good sense, but it is not required by law or otherwise," he replied.

"CCTS's role as an `ombudservice' is not to make the rules, but to see that customers are treated properly within the confines of the rules that do exist, the contractual terms or otherwise."

Daryl Charanduk, a certified financial planner, switched his business phone lines from Bell Canada to Allstream last February to get a significant monthly saving. In April, Bell charged him $700 for early termination of a contract. He called and said he was unaware of a contract.

Bell sent another request for payment in May. This time, it said he had been underbilled, since he was receiving the contract rate.

"The money owed is over $500," he says.

"Bell offered me a reduction of half the charge in September, but I felt in principle that I really should not pay anything.

``I still have a phone line with Bell, as I have a contract for my Internet. I did not move that line. I knew I had a contract. I have found this experience to be frustrating and aggravating, since I have been with Bell as a business customer going back to 1995."

The CCTS deals with complaints by residential customers and small businesses (defined as those whose most recent monthly bill for telecom services from the provider is $2,500 or less).

"I was unaware of the CCTS ombudservice or even where to look for it," says Charanduk, who submitted his complaint at the website, www.ccts-cprst.ca.

Consumers used to send complaints to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission. But its powers have shrunk with the trend to deregulation in recent years.

The CRTC recommended the establishment of an industry-funded organization with the authority to handle complaints about deregulated telecom services.

The CCTS now has 38 industry members, up from 16 in its first year. It provides written recommendations on how to resolve complaints – though members don't always follow its advice.

It can recommend payments to customers as compensation for loss, damage or inconvenience, up to a maximum of $5,000.

Of the 3,214 complaints resolved by the CCTS last year, Bell accounted for 1,239, Rogers Communications 672, Telus Communications 579 and Primus 393.

When talking about verbal contracts, the CCTS shifts the responsibility to customers to ask telecom providers about terms of service.

"We do not address the legality, fairness or validity of any particular contract or service term," its annual report explains.

However, it wants telecom providers to make the terms of service more visible and accessible to customers at the decision-making stage – even though this can be challenging.

"We encourage the industry to use its creativity to develop means by which key information can be provided to customers either prior to subscribing, or in writing thereafter with a right of cancellation until that information has been provided," it says.

This is one recommendation I hope the industry will follow. And if not, it's time for the federal government to make it mandatory.

source: www.thestar.com